Operational AI Governance

NIVAI AGF

NIVAI-AGF

AI Governance Framework

NIVAI-AGF:2026

You have deployed AI tools across your organisation. Do you know who is using what, where your data is going, and whether your governance holds up under scrutiny?

NIVAI-AGF:2026 is the certification standard for how organisations govern their use of AI, not just how they build it.

Section I

About the Standard

NIVAI-AGF focuses specifically on the AI interaction layer: how organisations use AI tools, what data moves through those interactions, which AI providers have the right agreements in place, whether AI sessions are traceable to individual identities, and whether acceptable use policy translates into verifiable practice.

116 controls across 18 domains. Every control requires specific, verifiable evidence: collected from connected tools, uploaded documents, endpoint monitoring, or structured registers. Not questionnaire answers.

Key Principle

Governance properties, not tier labels

Whether an AI tool is on a consumer or enterprise plan is irrelevant to certification. What matters is whether session data is training-opt-out confirmed, retention is bounded, usage is identity-attributed, and the organisation has administrative visibility. A team on a free plan with those four properties in place is more governed than one on an enterprise contract with none of them enforced.

116
Controls
18
Domains
5
Certification Gates

Section II

Governance Domains

Governs where AI-processed data resides and which jurisdictions it crosses. Ensures data sovereignty obligations are met before AI tools are authorised for use. Covers data residency, cross-border transfer controls, vendor data sovereignty, and continuous monitoring.

Detects and prevents sensitive organisational data from being submitted to AI tools without authorisation. Covers shadow AI detection, prompt content standards, and per-department AI governance for engineering, finance, HR, legal, and sales teams.

Ensures personal and sensitive data processed by AI tools meets privacy obligations under GDPR, POPIA, and equivalent frameworks. Covers data minimisation, consent chains, ungoverned AI privacy risk, and AI provider privacy assessment.

Governs who in the organisation can access which AI tools and under what conditions. Covers SSO enforcement, role-based access, MFA requirements, access review cycles, and AI tool deprovisioning.

Addresses security controls specific to AI tool usage: prompt injection risks, model poisoning vectors, API key management, and AI session security. Complements existing information security controls.

Ensures AI tools and services used in operations meet reliability and availability standards. Covers SLA documentation, failover mechanisms, fallback procedures, and business continuity for AI-dependent processes.

Governs the selection, deployment, monitoring, and retirement of AI models used in the organisation. Covers model risk assessment, performance monitoring, bias evaluation, and version control.

Ensures data in transit to and from AI providers is encrypted to required standards. Covers TLS enforcement, API communication security, prompt and output data protection, and encryption key management for AI-processed data.

Governs the human dimension of AI governance: employee training, acceptable use acknowledgement, background screening for AI-elevated roles, ethics policy, and concern reporting mechanisms.

Ensures AI tool expenditure is governed, approved, and tracked. Covers procurement controls, contract review, financial data controls for AI-processed financial data, and audit trails for financial AI use.

Governs the use of AI tools in software development workflows. Covers AI code review requirements, CI/CD gate controls, development data governance, model testing, and dependency management.

Addresses operational governance of AI tool usage: monitoring, change control, capacity management, operational runbooks, and audit logging for AI-dependent workflows.

The foundation domain. Covers board-level AI oversight, governance policy, accountability structures, ethics framework, regulatory compliance, AIMS context and scope documentation, decision oversight, and AI transparency disclosure.

Governs the identification, assessment, treatment, and monitoring of AI-specific risks. Covers a comprehensive risk management framework including the live risk register, risk tolerance statement, third-party concentration risk, and treatment plans.

Ensures AI governance is subject to regular internal and external audit. Covers audit programme design, evidence collection requirements, findings management, continuous compliance monitoring, and auditor spot-check capability.

Governs the use of AI tools in customer-facing sales and marketing activities. Covers AI disclosure obligations, CRM data governance in AI tools, proposal accuracy review, and AI sales analytics governance.

Governs the organisation's response to AI-related incidents. Covers the incident response plan for AI sovereignty and leakage events, incident documentation and root cause analysis, and periodic control testing including red team exercises.

Governs AI systems that act on behalf of users via delegated credentials or autonomous execution. Covers cross-session credential isolation, autonomous action authorisation, AI agent credential purge on offboarding, cross-user context isolation, AI action attribution, and shared orchestrator credential architecture.

Total116 controls across 18 domains

Section III

Nivaya Certified

Organisations that meet all five certification gates receive the Nivaya Certified designation, countersigned by a registered NIVAI auditor.

I
Score Threshold
Overall AI governance score meets the minimum threshold
II
No Critical Failures
No critical-severity control is in FAIL status
III
Domain Coverage
Evidence collected across the required minimum number of domains
IV
Evidence Completeness
Sufficient proportion of controls evaluated with verifiable evidence
V
Auditor Countersignature
A registered NIVAI auditor reviews and countersigns the assessment

Nivaya Certified demonstrates that an organisation's AI governance evidence is collected, verified, and auditor-ready. It does not replace certification under ISO 42001, SOC 2, or any other framework. It addresses the AI governance layer those frameworks do not cover.

Regulatory Readiness

A defensible record when regulators ask

GDPR and POPIA enforcement is accelerating around AI data transfers. Regulators are asking organisations to demonstrate where AI session data was processed, which vendors had access, and what contractual protections were in place at the time.

Organisations certified under NIVAI-AGF:2026 hold a verified evidence record covering data residency (8 controls), privacy obligations (8 controls), and vendor agreements across every AI tool in active use. That record is auditor-countersigned and time-stamped.

Not a self-assessment. Evidence collected from connected systems, reviewed by an independent registered auditor, and ready to produce on request.

Collaborate

Contribute to NIVAI-AGF

NIVAI-AGF is a living standard. We actively seek input from AI governance practitioners, compliance professionals, legal and privacy experts, and security teams working with AI tools in production environments.

If you have identified gaps in the framework, controls that do not reflect current practice, or domains that require revision, we want to hear from you. Contributions are reviewed by the NIVAI standards committee ahead of each release cycle.

certify@nivai.org

Community

Join the conversation

Discuss AI governance practices, ask questions about the NIVAI-AGF standard, and connect with compliance professionals, security teams, and practitioners working through certification.

Join #ai-governance

Workspace: nivai-community.slack.com

Enquiries

Certification & Framework Enquiries

For certification requirements, auditor registration, or to request the full NIVAI-AGF control specification:

certify@nivai.org